Nature, Published online: 05 March 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-00682-3 Study in mice and human cadavers hints that a brain-protective gene in the chromosome becomes more active with age.
Nature, Published online: 05 March 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-00659-2 Momentum is building behind a variety of therapies that can slow, stop or even reverse the most advanced form of the eye condition age-related
Nature, Published online: 05 March 2025; doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08652-5 Bone tools shaped by knapping found within Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania precede any other evidence of systematic bone tool production by more than 1
Nature, Published online: 05 March 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-00543-z Fast electromagnetic follow-up observations of gravitational-wave sources such as binary neutron stars could shed light on questions across physics and cosmology. A machine-learning approach
Nature, Published online: 05 March 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-00689-w An amyloid protein targeted by Alzheimer’s disease therapies seems to be involved in normal mental decline.
Nature, Published online: 05 March 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-00653-8 The scale of work to improve therapies for eye disease reflects the importance people place on sight.
Nature, Published online: 05 March 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-00690-3 Locating sources of gravitational waves using artificial intelligence could enable astronomers to point telescopes at stellar mergers before they happen.
Nature, Published online: 05 March 2025; doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08639-2 A mixed-precision heterogeneous memristor combined with a compute-in-memory artificial intelligence (AI) processor allows optimization of the precision, energy efficiency, storage and wakeup-to-response time requirements
Nature, Published online: 05 March 2025; doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08670-3 The unique structure and mechanism of chanoclavine synthase (EasC), a haem catalase that uses superoxide for substrate transformation in ergot alkaloid biosynthesis, are revealed
Nature, Published online: 05 March 2025; doi:10.1038/d41586-025-00676-1 But numbers remain steady for researchers who commit scientific misconduct.