NIH Director Removes Four Main Scientists amid Massive Staff Purge

South Africans flush toilets with drinkable water. Study in Cape Town looked at using seawater instead

SpaceX’s Fram2 Mission Sends Four Private Astronauts into Polar Orbit

Enhanced westerly winds lead to increased ocean heat transport to the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, study finds

Surprising number of environmental pollutants found in hedgehogs

A classification of drugs based on their environmental impact

The rivers that science says shouldn’t exist

Air pollution and traffic noise increase the risk of stroke through combination effect

California wildfire threatening forest home of world’s oldest tree

Tree rings from Canada’s Gaspésie mountains reveal effects of global warming dating back almost a century

2 min read
View Original
As Los Angeles County grappled with catastrophic wildfires, a troubling revelation emerged – major oil corporations had intensively lobbied against a bill that would have held them accountable for the costs of climate disasters. The “polluter pay” legislation, which made its way through the California Senate, aimed to require fossil fuel giants to contribute to the financial burden of environmental calamities exacerbated by their activities.The Guardian’s investigation into state lobby filings unveiled a startling surge in fossil fuel industry lobbying during the 2023-24 legislative session, reaching unprecedented levels. The “polluter pay” bill found itself in the crosshairs, among the most heavily targeted pieces of legislation by these influential players.

Climate scientists have long warned about the escalating risks of extreme weather events, fueled by rising global temperatures driven by greenhouse gas emissions. The Los Angeles wildfires serve as a sobering reminder of the devastating consequences communities face due to the intensifying climate crisis.

Environmental advocates argue that the principles of accountability and corporate responsibility should compel major polluters to shoulder a portion of the immense costs associated with disaster response, recovery, and mitigation efforts. Proponents of the “polluter pay” approach view it as a crucial step toward internalizing the true societal and environmental costs of fossil fuel extraction and combustion.

As the debate over climate policy intensifies, the fossil fuel industry’s vigorous opposition to measures like the “polluter pay” bill underscores the uphill battle policymakers face in enacting substantive reforms to address the climate emergency. Striking a balance between economic interests and environmental imperatives remains a formidable challenge.