Environment watchdog confirms Sydney’s mystery beach balls likely came from sewage treatment plants

On water recycling, Nevada leads other states, report finds

What you do before and during a tornado could mean the difference between life and death

When heavy rainfall threatens flooding, you can protect yourself. Here’s how

Anesthetic gas emissions have dropped by 27% in last decade, but there’s room for improvement

How Tariffs Could Upend the Transition to Cleaner Energy

The Uninhabited Heard and McDonald Islands, Targeted by Tariffs, Are a Biological Wonderland

Storing CO₂ beneath the German North Sea: Interim report

Bonobo Calls Are More like Human Language Than We Thought

JWST Delivers Best-Yet Look at That Worrisome Asteroid

2 min read
View Original
As Los Angeles County grappled with catastrophic wildfires, a troubling revelation emerged – major oil corporations had intensively lobbied against a bill that would have held them accountable for the costs of climate disasters. The “polluter pay” legislation, which made its way through the California Senate, aimed to require fossil fuel giants to contribute to the financial burden of environmental calamities exacerbated by their activities.The Guardian’s investigation into state lobby filings unveiled a startling surge in fossil fuel industry lobbying during the 2023-24 legislative session, reaching unprecedented levels. The “polluter pay” bill found itself in the crosshairs, among the most heavily targeted pieces of legislation by these influential players.

Climate scientists have long warned about the escalating risks of extreme weather events, fueled by rising global temperatures driven by greenhouse gas emissions. The Los Angeles wildfires serve as a sobering reminder of the devastating consequences communities face due to the intensifying climate crisis.

Environmental advocates argue that the principles of accountability and corporate responsibility should compel major polluters to shoulder a portion of the immense costs associated with disaster response, recovery, and mitigation efforts. Proponents of the “polluter pay” approach view it as a crucial step toward internalizing the true societal and environmental costs of fossil fuel extraction and combustion.

As the debate over climate policy intensifies, the fossil fuel industry’s vigorous opposition to measures like the “polluter pay” bill underscores the uphill battle policymakers face in enacting substantive reforms to address the climate emergency. Striking a balance between economic interests and environmental imperatives remains a formidable challenge.