Why Aurora Physicists Are Excited about Fram2’s Private Astronauts

Bye-bye, Helene, Milton and Beryl. Names from those nasty hurricanes are now retired

This is what forecasters mean when they talk about a 100-year flood

Research reveals that Northern Ireland is feeling strain of climate change

How the Ukraine War Caused Extreme Environmental Damage

For the first time in 25 years, California has a snowpack trifecta

Helicopter-mounted sensor reveals volcanic CO₂ emissions could be three times higher than anticipated

Alcohol makes male fruit flies more attractive

US banks predict climate goals will fail – but air conditioning firms will thrive

Hunga volcano eruption’s unexpected Southern Hemisphere cooling effect challenges geoengineering assumptions

2 min read
View Original
As Los Angeles County grappled with catastrophic wildfires, a troubling revelation emerged – major oil corporations had intensively lobbied against a bill that would have held them accountable for the costs of climate disasters. The “polluter pay” legislation, which made its way through the California Senate, aimed to require fossil fuel giants to contribute to the financial burden of environmental calamities exacerbated by their activities.The Guardian’s investigation into state lobby filings unveiled a startling surge in fossil fuel industry lobbying during the 2023-24 legislative session, reaching unprecedented levels. The “polluter pay” bill found itself in the crosshairs, among the most heavily targeted pieces of legislation by these influential players.

Climate scientists have long warned about the escalating risks of extreme weather events, fueled by rising global temperatures driven by greenhouse gas emissions. The Los Angeles wildfires serve as a sobering reminder of the devastating consequences communities face due to the intensifying climate crisis.

Environmental advocates argue that the principles of accountability and corporate responsibility should compel major polluters to shoulder a portion of the immense costs associated with disaster response, recovery, and mitigation efforts. Proponents of the “polluter pay” approach view it as a crucial step toward internalizing the true societal and environmental costs of fossil fuel extraction and combustion.

As the debate over climate policy intensifies, the fossil fuel industry’s vigorous opposition to measures like the “polluter pay” bill underscores the uphill battle policymakers face in enacting substantive reforms to address the climate emergency. Striking a balance between economic interests and environmental imperatives remains a formidable challenge.